Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542197›Full record

ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Snorkel breathing technique in anesthesia: A narrative review.

Balaji Vaithialingam, Ramachandra Karnate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Balaji VaithialingamDivision of Neuroanesthesiology and Neurocritical Care, International Institute of Neurosciences, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ramachandra KarnateDepartment of Anesthesiology, Aster Whitefield Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this narrative review is to investigate the existing evidence supporting the use of the snorkel breathing technique in anesthesia practice. In addition, this review aims to identify certain patient scenarios where the snorkel breathing approach can be appropriate. A total of nine articles relevant to anesthesia and airway management were retrieved using the search strategy. A review of the final papers found that the snorkel breathing technique offers a few advantages over using a regular face mask in the operating room. The snorkel or mouthpiece breathing approach can be as effective as the traditional face mask for successful preoxygenation, as defined by an end-tidal oxygen concentration greater than 0.9. The snorkel breathing approach can be a viable option in patient populations where face mask application is challenging. It also has greater acceptance than the face mask among patients and healthy volunteers. Another advantage of the snorkel breathing technique is that it can be utilized to provide apneic oxygenation during rapid sequence induction using short-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs, reducing the use of plastic (face mask). For older children and claustrophobic adults who are apprehensive about masks, snorkel gas induction can make anesthesia induction smoother and more pleasant. The snorkel breathing technique has potential application in certain anesthetic scenarios, and this narrative review also incorporates the author's clinical experience with it. To validate the effect of this novel technique (snorkel preoxygenation and snorkel gas induction) on patient-centered outcomes, more randomized controlled trials are required.

Indexed as

Apneic oxygenationmouthpiecepediatric gas inductionplastic wastesevofluranesnorkel breathingsnorkel gas inductionsnorkel preoxygenationvital capacity breaths

Identifiers

PMID41542197
PMCPMC12803320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.