ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Freezing tissues pre-homogenisation reduces degradation and yields improved quality RNA in the mouse lung.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction requires meticulous sample handling to ensure purity and integrity. Although a variety of commercial kits are available, along with optimised protocols, pre-extraction sample processing remains a challenging procedure, especially with tissue samples. In our brief report, we describe the beneficial impact of freezing tissues before homogenisation on the quality of RNA extraction. Lung tissues were freshly excised from mice and homogenised with or without prior quick freezing in a freezer. Then, RNA was extracted according to the protocol provided with a commercial column-based RNA extraction kit. RNA quality was analysed by UV absorbance and agarose gel electrophoresis. We found that the frozen tissues yielded better-quality, more intact RNA than the non-frozen tissues, possibly due to lower temperatures during homogenisation. "Smearing", indicative of RNA degradation, was visible in some of the non-frozen samples. The extra quick-freezing step provides a simple and affordable method for preserving high-quality RNA, especially from tissue samples. Further comparisons can be made to determine whether the observed benefits extend to other tissue types or to quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis in gene expression studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.