Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542155›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Assessment of scoring functions for computational models of protein-protein interfaces.

Jacob Sumner, Naomi Brandt, Grace Meng, Devon Finlay, Alex T Grigas, Andrés Córdoba, Mark D Shattuck, Corey S O'Hern

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob SumnerGraduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Naomi BrandtIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Grace MengIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Devon FinlayIntegrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Alex T GrigasGraduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Andrés CórdobaGraduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.
Mark D ShattuckBenjamin Levich Institute and Physics Department, The City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA.
Corey S O'HernGraduate Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
Convergent graduate training in systems biology at YaleT32GM145452 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KATHRYN MILLER-JENSEN, Corey O'Hern · 2022 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145452NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important goal of computational studies of protein-protein interfaces (PPIs) is to predict the binding site between two monomers that form a heterodimer. The simplest version of this problem is to rigidly re-dock the bound forms of the monomers, which involves generating computational models of the heterodimer and then scoring them to determine the most native-like models. PPI scoring functions have been assessed previously using rank- and classification-based metrics; however, these methods are sensitive to the number and quality of models in the scoring function training set. We assess the accuracy of seven PPI scoring functions by comparing their scores of computational models of PPIs to a measure of structural similarity to the x-ray crystal structure (i.e. the DockQ score) for a non-redundant set of heterodimers from the Protein Data Bank. For each heterodimer, we generate re-docked models uniformly sampled over DockQ and calculate the Spearman correlation between the PPI scores and DockQ. For some targets, the scores and DockQ are highly correlated; however, for many targets, there are weak correlations. Several physical features explain the difference between difficult- and easy-to-score targets. Strong correlations exist between the score and DockQ for targets with highly intertwined monomers and many interface contacts. We also develop a new score based on only two physical features that matches the performance of current PPI scoring functions. In addition, we address the more general problem of flexible-body docking by generating and docking intermediate monomer conformations between their bound and unbound forms. We score the docked models and find that the Spearman correlations between the PPI scores and DockQ decrease strongly as the monomers are deformed from their bound conformations. These results emphasize that PPI docking predictions can be improved by focusing on correlations between the PPI score and DockQ and incorporating more discriminating physical features into PPI scoring functions.

Identifiers

PMID41542155
PMCPMC12803336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.