ArticleCJC open2025
A Qualitative Study Exploring Women's Understanding and Experiences of Managing Hypertension in Primary Care.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Qualitative insights into the experiences and goals of people living with severe difficult-to-treat hypertension in Australia.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension in women is an important precursor to heart disease, and even when they are on antihypertensive medications, women have higher blood pressure, compared to men. This study aimed to use a theory-informed approach to understand the experiences of women living with hypertension in managing their condition within the primary care setting. Methods: We conducted virtual semistructured interviews, in February-June 2023, with Canadian women aged > 40 years who self-identified as experiencing hypertension. The interview guide was developed based on the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model to explore the perceptions/experiences of women living with hypertension. Additionally, intersectionality questions were added. A deductive approach using the dimensions of the model was applied, and an inductive approach was used to identify themes within the dimensions. Two patient partners were involved in this study throughout the research. Results: The women interviewed had a good understanding of the causes of hypertension, and they strongly emphasized stress-induced causes. Their coping strategies included changing their diet and lifestyle choices, taking medications, measuring their blood pressure at home, and visiting their physician. Strong experiences were shared by the participants-of being dismissed as having "white coat" hypertension or nonadherence to medicines, and ageism. Many felt they had to be "armed with proof Conclusions: Women with hypertension expressed feelings of not being taken seriously, and the need to provide evidence to advocate for their management. Hypertension interventions need to be tailored to women and account for their intersectionality experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.