Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542107›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2026

Local Perforator Flaps in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: Clinical Applications of ICAP and TDAP Flaps in Reconstruction and Complication Management.

Georg Schmidt, Theresa Mayo, Angela von Falkenhausen, Marion Kiechle, Daniel Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georg SchmidtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TUM University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-9159
Theresa MayoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TUM University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Angela von FalkenhausenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TUM University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marion KiechleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TUM University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel MüllerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TUM University Hospital and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCCTUM), Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Local perforator flaps have become an increasingly important option in oncoplastic breast surgery. Despite their long-standing use, their application in clinical practice remains limited. This study evaluates the use of thoracic wall perforator flaps, specifically the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) and thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flaps, for volume and skin replacement after breast-conserving therapy and in the management of complications following reconstructive procedures. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 patients treated with local perforator flaps between March 2022 and March 2025 at the Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar. Follow-up examinations were conducted in a standardized manner by the primary surgeon and included clinical and ultrasound assessments of the flap, as well as documentation of complications, perfusion, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: ICAP flaps were used in 39 cases and TDAP flaps in 11 cases. The majority of reconstructions (72%) were immediate. ICAP flaps were mainly used for lower and central defects, whereas TDAP flaps were used for upper outer quadrant and complex cases. The mean operative time was 109 minutes, longer for TDAP flaps (153 minutes). There was no total flap loss and complications were rare (one partial necrosis, three seromas). Radiotherapy was administered in 72% of cases without flap compromise. Flaps were also effective in the management of implant-related or autologous reconstruction complications. Discussion: Perforator flaps offer reliable, low morbidity reconstruction options with good aesthetic outcomes and low complication rates, even after radiotherapy. They are also suitable for secondary reconstruction and management of complications. Conclusion: Local perforator flaps, particularly ICAP and TDAP, are safe, versatile tools in oncoplastic breast surgery and should be more widely considered in clinical practice.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast conserving surgeryoncoplastic breast surgeryperforator flap surgery

Identifiers

PMID41542107
PMCPMC12803764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.