ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Development and multi-center validation of a software program, Ofeye 3.0, for automated all-inclusive vertebral fracture detection with chest/abdominal CT images.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From underdiagnosis to scalable screening: Applications of artificial intelligence for vertebral compression fracture detection - a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2026Review
- Redefining orthopaedic translation: Harnessing multi-omics, smart biomaterials, and regenerative immunomodulation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Missing report for fragility vertebral fracture (VF) on chest/abdominal CT is common when the indication is not spine disorders. This represents a missed opportunity to alert patients to take preventive measures to improve bone health and prevent further severe fractures. In this study, we aim to develop a software program for automated detection of VF with existing chest/abdominal CT scans and validate its detection performance. Methods: An automated sagittal Central Slab reconstruction (CSR) method for CT axial images was developed. For reference VF reading Results: The automated CSR method showed advantages in demonstrating structural changes of the endplate and adjacent structures. For detecting VF in chest/abdominal CT scans, counting case-by-case and compared with the reference reading, the average performance of Ofeye 3.0 was accuracy 0.967, sensitivity 0.906, and specificity 0.986. Most of false negative or false positive cases were minimal or mild VF, or with image artifacts, or with VF close to the peripheral of CSR images. Conclusions: Despite the challenging requirements for the software to detect all-inclusive VF, our results compare favorably with other published automated VF detection models. The translational potential of this article: We developed a software program for automated all-inclusive VF detection on chest and/or abdominal CT image data and conducted a multi-center external validation study. This software is proved to have high VF detection precision. By alerting patients of the VFs likely related to osteoporosis and in turn the patients taking measures to prevent further fracture, the integration of this software into radiological practice will improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.