ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- D81 Mutants Reveal Hidden EF-Tu Diversity while Natural Sequences Preserve Aspartate.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Multi-state Structure Prediction of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Proteins via Prompting on AlphaFold.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- AlphaFold in protein structure and function prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insect odorant receptors (iORs) are seven-transmembrane-domain (7TM) ion channels crucial for insect survival, playing key roles in insect behaviour such as foraging, pollination, social interaction, and prey recognition. Unlike G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), iORs are "inverted" in the membrane and function independently of accessory G proteins. iORs form complexes with a highly conserved co-receptor (Orco), allowing calcium ions to enter the cell upon ligand binding and are promising targets for pest control strategies. However, due to their structural complexity, experimental determination of iOR structures remains a challenge. This scarcity of experimental data underscores the urgent need for reliable computational modeling approaches to understand iOR structure and function. With the rise of the deep learning (DL) approach AlphaFold, currently in its third version, we explored whether detailed template-based modeling (TBM), using the few available experimental insect OR structures, is still required, instead of a quick AI-generated AlphaFold 3 (AF3) model. For six OR sequences from three insect orders, we compared TBM models with standard AF3 models, and AF3 models with lipid molecules, creating an artificial membrane. Our evaluation of functional mutagenesis data supports TBM models for iORs rather than AF3 models, for ligand discovery for insect pest-specific control using structure-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.