Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541985›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Surgeon's Blind Spot: A Narrative Review of Psychological Risks and Assessment Strategies in Invasive Aesthetic Surgery Patients.

Harmeen Jagpal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Harmeen JagpalPsychiatry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cosmetic surgery aims to enhance appearance and psychological well-being, and its popularity is rapidly increasing. Cosmetic surgery patients are much more likely to report mental health concerns than other surgical groups, yet clinicians often lack understanding of psychological outcomes and assessment strategies. A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), and Google Scholar with the keywords "cosmetic surgery", "aesthetic surgery", "self-esteem", "anxiety", and "body dysmorphia" to evaluate the psychological effects of invasive cosmetic procedures. Additionally, this review evaluates the use of pre-operative psychological assessments within the United Kingdom cosmetic surgery practices. Most studies showed cosmetic surgery improved body image but had limited or no effect on self-esteem. Depression often persisted or worsened postoperatively. Women undergoing breast augmentation were two to three times more likely to die by suicide than other cosmetic surgery patients. Individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) consistently experienced no improvement or a decline in psychological well-being after surgery. Pre- and post-operative psychological assessment is essential but underused, with over half of the plastic surgeons in the United Kingdom not routinely screening patients. Standardised assessment guidelines are urgently needed to mitigate psychological harm.

Indexed as

aesthetic facial surgeryaesthetic surgeryanxietybody dysmorphiabody imagecosmetic proceduresfacial cosmetic surgeryself-esteemsuicide and depression

Identifiers

PMID41541985
PMCPMC12803423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.