ArticleCureus2025
Re-examining the Diagnostic Criteria for Wilson's Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wilson's disease (WD) is a heterogeneous genetic disorder for which diagnosis is challenging. We present the case of a 54-year-old woman with a complicated medical history, including hepatitis C, cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy, and extensive psychiatric disease, who was transferred to our hospital for management of a spinal epidural abscess. Further findings suggested undiagnosed WD, including bilateral rings around Descemet's membrane and modestly low ceruloplasmin but normal urinary copper excretion. Many algorithms have been proposed for Wilson disease diagnosis, including clinical, laboratory, imaging, and genetic findings; however, no single test is diagnostic. The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines are the most commonly employed algorithm. Updated 2022 guidelines by both the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the British Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL) build upon this algorithm. Our patient scored 5 points on the EASL scale, which is sufficient for diagnosis. Nevertheless, we believe that she met the diagnostic criteria without having the actual disease. Newer guidelines by AASLD and BASL do not provide additional conclusivity. Our case demonstrates the need for re-evaluation of the diagnostic criteria of WD, where uncertainty can mean permanent hepatic and brain damage. Diagnostic guidelines should incorporate new biomarkers, ophthalmological techniques, and advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing or CRISPR-Cas-based tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.