Prosthetic Options for Full-Mouth Implant Rehabilitation: A Contemporary Review.

Deeksha Surabathula, Sanket Birajdar, Mridula Joshi, Mirella Vaz, Nilesha Kadam

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deeksha SurabathulaProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be Universty) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Sanket BirajdarProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be Universty) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Mridula JoshiProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be Universty) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Mirella VazProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be Universty) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Nilesha KadamProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be Universty) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Full-mouth implant rehabilitation offers a transformative solution for edentulous patients, restoring function, esthetics, and quality of life. With evolving materials and digital technologies, clinicians today can choose from a spectrum of fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses tailored to individual clinical conditions. This review evaluates prosthetic designs, including All-on-Four and All-on-Six concepts, fixed monolithic zirconia and metal-supported prostheses, implant-supported overdentures, and retention mechanisms such as bar, stud, and locator attachments. Emphasis is placed on biomechanical considerations, material selection, digital workflows, and long-term clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

all-on-four conceptall-on-six conceptfull-mouth rehabilitationimplant-supported overdentureremovable full-arch prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID41541951

DOI10.7759/cureus.99222

PMCPMC12799391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.