ArticleCureus2025
Analysis of Latent Esophageal Perforation Caused by a Mysteriously Migrated Anterior Cervical Plate Into the Gastrointestinal Tract.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cervical implant migration through the pharyngoesophageal perforation is a very rare but serious condition that often necessitates surgical intervention. Nevertheless, rare cases have demonstrated recovery through conservative management. This article presents a 40-year-old man with dislodgement of an anterior cervical plate five years post-surgery. A last-minute radiography prior to salvage surgery revealed that the implant was no longer in its original position, and subsequent imaging traced its journey through the gastrointestinal tract. The esophageal perforation caused by the migrated implant was managed with a conservative approach. This study reviewed the literature of disappeared or naturally displaced cervical implants that resolved without surgery. An implant's disappearance or natural excretion is rare, with clinical presentations ranging from asymptomatic cases to severe symptoms such as dysphagia or oral expulsion. The time interval between surgery and implant excretion varies from five weeks to 11 years. Asymptomatic gastrointestinal elimination is more frequent in men, whereas oral expulsion predominates in women. Although younger patients generally recover faster, conservative management is also effective in older individuals. This study emphasizes the importance of last-minute radiological imaging prior to surgery in patients with implant dislodgement, and a "watch and wait" conservative approach should be considered in certain esophageal perforation cases. Additionally, a missing hardware could be considered to have been excreted through the gastrointestinal tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.