ReviewCureus2025
Emerging Therapeutic Synergies: Combining PD-1 Inhibitors With Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gynecologic Cancers.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and Future Directions in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Paradigm Shifts to Data-Driven Design.Cancers · 2026Review
- Beyond PD-1/PD-L1: Reprogramming the Gynecologic Tumor Microenvironment by Targeting TIGIT and Myeloid Suppression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecological cancers (ovarian, endometrial, cervical) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, driven by late presentation and resistance to standard therapies. Immune checkpoint blockade (PD-1/PD-L1) and PARP inhibition have each improved outcomes in biomarker-defined subsets. Preclinical data suggest synergy between these classes via PARP-induced DNA damage, cGAS-STING activation, and enhanced tumor immunogenicity, which may be amplified by PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We performed a narrative review with a structured literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 1, 2015, to August 24, 2025) for interventional trials evaluating a PARP inhibitor combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent in ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, endometrial, or cervical cancer. Eligibility required ≥1 efficacy endpoint (objective response rate {ORR}, progression-free survival {PFS}, and/or overall survival {OS}) plus safety in an extractable gynecology-only cohort (≥20 evaluable patients or any phase III). Triplets were eligible if the third agent was non-cytotoxic (e.g., bevacizumab). Regimens with concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy in the investigational combination were excluded. Nine studies met the criteria (one phase III; eight phase I/II). In recurrent ovarian cancer, niraparib+pembrolizumab showed modest activity with durable responses in homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) tumors; olaparib+durvalumab demonstrated high activity in gBRCA platinum-sensitive relapse, and adding bevacizumab broadened benefit in non-BRCA cohorts. In the newly diagnosed disease, rucaparib+nivolumab maintenance failed to improve PFS versus rucaparib alone. Endometrial trials (olaparib+durvalumab; talazoparib+avelumab in mismatch repair-proficient disease) showed limited activity overall, with signals restricted to biomarker-selected subgroups. Toxicities reflected expected myelosuppression from PARP inhibitors and immune-related adverse events, generally manageable with standard algorithms. PARP+PD-1/PD-L1 combinations are most compelling in ovarian cancer, particularly in BRCA/HRD tumors and, in selected settings, with the addition of bevacizumab, while frontline maintenance benefit remains unproven and endometrial activity is modest. Biomarker-guided selection, rational triplets with non-cytotoxic partners, and optimized sequencing warrant further evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.