Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541931›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Influence of Clinical Experience on Learning the Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Protocol: A Pilot Study.

Cristiano M Quintão, Gabriela P Domingues, Antonio Toledo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristiano M QuintãoHealth Department, Prefeitura Municipal de Conceição do Mato Dentro, Conceição do Mato Dentro, BRA.
Gabriela P DominguesInternal Medicine Department, Universidade Professor Edson Antônio Velano, Belo Horizonte, BRA.
Antonio ToledoInternal Medicine Department, Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), and specifically the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) protocol, is widely used to expedite the assessment of trauma patients at the bedside, but optimal strategies for teaching FAST and the role of prior clinical experience in learning remain unclear. Brief, structured training programs are increasingly proposed for undergraduate and early postgraduate curricula, yet evidence comparing learners with different clinical backgrounds is limited. Objective This study aimed to compare the performance of physicians and final-year medical students without prior ultrasound experience in learning the FAST protocol after structured training. Materials and methods This is a quasi-experimental, non-blinded pilot study. Participants were non-imaging physicians and final-year medical students. All received a standardized four-hour theoretical-practical FAST training and completed pre- and post-written tests. Two weeks later, the participants underwent practical assessments on human models and an ultrasound simulator. Scores were converted to percentages for comparability. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive analyses were done. Comparative analysis included between-group comparisons and pre- and post-test paired comparisons, including effect size. Parametric or non-parametric tests were used as appropriate. Two-sided tests were used with α = 0.05. Effect sizes and p-values were computed in JASP v0.19.3 (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands). Results Forty volunteers participated (physicians n = 19; final-year medical students n = 21). Physicians scored higher than students on both pre- and post-training written tests (pre-test total: 53.6% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.004; post-test total: 76.1% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001). Paired analyses showed significant improvements across all written components for both groups, with very large paired effect sizes (rank-biserial correlation (RBC) ranged from 0.77 to 1.00); the largest absolute gain was in image identification among students (+29.5 percentage points, RBC = 0.86) and in theoretical assessment among physicians (+28.1 points, RBC = 1.00). In Phase 2 practical assessments (n = 37), no statistically significant differences were found between groups in overall or FAST-specific scores, but students completed tasks substantially faster (mean time ≈5 min vs. ≈10 min for physicians; p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy in the simulated cases was high in both groups; only one physician made an incorrect diagnosis (p = 0.245). Overall, brief structured FAST training produced large within-subject gains in knowledge and skills across both learner groups. Conclusions Brief structured FAST training produced substantial gains in knowledge and skills for both groups. Comparable practical performance between physicians and students suggests that procedural competence can be effectively acquired through structured training regardless of prior clinical experience, supporting early integration of ultrasonography training into undergraduate curricula.

Indexed as

bedside diagnosisfocused assessment with sonography for trauma (fast)medical educationpoint-of-care ultrasound (pocus)ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41541931
PMCPMC12803007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.