Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541879›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2025

Case Report: Mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever devices in deep cerebral venous thrombosis: illustrative cases.

Álvaro Martínez-Martín, Francisco Hernández-Fernández, Juan David Molina-Nuevo, Blanca Serrano Serrano, Tomás Segura

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Álvaro Martínez-MartínNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Francisco Hernández-FernándezNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Juan David Molina-NuevoRadiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Blanca Serrano SerranoNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Tomás SeguraNeurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis has traditionally been based on anticoagulant therapy. However, in certain circumstances, such as deep cerebral venous thrombosis, anticoagulation may be insufficient, so endovascular treatment by mechanical thrombectomy has been used for some years. There is currently no clear indication of which device is the gold standard in the endovascular treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis, although stent retriever devices are the most commonly used. Case presentation: We describe two cases of deep cerebral venous thrombosis refractory to anticoagulant treatment treated by mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever devices, one of which has not been described to date as being used in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (Tiger XL Conclusions: Some situations in like deep cerebral venous thrombosis may require endovascular treatment with mechanical thrombectomy if anticoagulation fails, with increasing evidence that it improves vital and functional prognosis.

Indexed as

cerebral venous thrombosiscontraceptives (oral)endovascular treatmentmechanical thrombectomystent retriever

Identifiers

PMID41541879
PMCPMC12802762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.