ArticleFrontiers in stroke2025
The impact of Heads Up testing on thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Heads Up test, initially described in 2017, offers a potential tool for assessing likelihood of collateral failure in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) but low or resolving NIH who may become candidates for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). By raising the head of bed and performing serial exams (Heads Up test), detection of early symptomatic worsening may indicate vulnerability of collateral blood supply. The present study aims to examine the practical applications and outcomes of the Heads Up test in one institution over 9 years by analyzing 15 consecutive cases of documented Heads Up testing. Our findings suggest that the Heads Up test can provide valuable guidance in treatment decisions, but further data is needed to refine its criteria and applicability in the evolving neurointerventional practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.