ReviewJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2025
Effectiveness of remineralizing dentifrices against caries lesions: A systematic approach.
Review in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Dental caries remains a prevalent global oral health problem. Fluoride promotes enamel remineralization but is less effective on deeper lesions. Non-invasive agents, including bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), aim to enhance remineralization and prevent caries. Methods: A systematic review of in vitro studies was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for studies published before 31 December 31, 2024. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified CONSORT checklist. Results: Among 142 records identified, 38 were screened, 21 full texts retrieved, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Bioactive glass-based dentifrices generally outperformed fluoride-only formulations, with greater mineral deposition, improved surface microhardness, and reduced lesion depth. The assessment methods included surface microhardness (Vickers or Knoop hardness testing), transverse microradiography, and scanning electron microscopy. Conclusions: Bioactive glass and CPP-ACP exhibited promise for in vitro remineralization, and bioactive glass was consistently superior to fluoride alone. Methodological variability and limited randomization, blinding, and sample size justification reduced the reproducibility of studies. Well-designed in situ and clinical studies are needed to confirm clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.