Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541833›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2025

Impact of breast reconstruction on quality of life among women after mastectomy.

Anthony M Ban, Branka V Ličanin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony M BanSubspecialist in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pula General Hospital, Croatia.
Branka V LičaninAlma Mater Europaea, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy represents an important component of rehabilitation for women who have survived breast cancer, although it is not considered a mandatory part of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of breast reconstruction on various aspects of quality of life, including physical, emotional, and social well-being, and to assess its contribution to overall patient satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 100 women who had undergone breast reconstruction within the past seven years. A specifically developed five-point Likert scale was used to assess perceptions of physical comfort, emotional well-being, self-esteem, and social interaction. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), with descriptive and inferential statistical methods applied. Results: The analysis revealed significant improvements in the overall quality of life among women who underwent breast reconstruction. Statistically significant differences were observed in domains of physical comfort, emotional stability, and self-confidence. Participants also reported enhanced social interactions and greater life satisfaction. These findings indicate that breast reconstruction contributes not only to physical recovery but also to emotional and social reintegration following mastectomy. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has a positive impact on women's quality of life by improving physical condition, emotional stability, and social functioning. The results highlight the importance of including breast reconstruction as an integral part of post-mastectomy rehabilitation. Future research should focus on refining rehabilitation protocols and developing comprehensive support systems to further enhance patient outcomes and well-being.

Indexed as

Breast reconstructionMastectomyPsychosocial adjustmentQuality of lifeRehabilitationWomen

Identifiers

PMID41541833
PMCPMC12799536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.