Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541809›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Culturally adapting family interventions for people with schizophrenia in Indonesia: An intervention development study using programme theory.

Laoise Renwick, Herni Susanti, Budi-Anna Keliat, Dewi Wulandari, Suherman, Rizqy Fadilah, Raphita Diorarta, Helen Brooks, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laoise RenwickDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Herni SusantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Budi-Anna KeliatFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Dewi WulandariFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
SuhermanFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Rizqy FadilahFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Raphita DiorartaFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Helen BrooksDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Karina LovellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a leading cause of disability and global burden worldwide. Low- and middle-income settings are disproportionately affected, and evidence-based, psychosocial interventions are largely unavailable, undeveloped and under-researched for this population. Family interventions have a particularly strong evidence base for reducing relapse risk with medium to large effect sizes. World Health Organisation international clinical guidelines, recommend family interventions as an essential intervention in these settings. Despite this, evidence is emerging that family interventions can deliver positive outcomes in these settings and there are few studies examining the suitability and effectiveness of delivering these in settings with varied socio-economic climates and cultural differences. We used the Medical Research Council Framework for Developing Complex Interventions, conducting a series of separate but interrelated studies to adapt a testable, evidence-based, culturally relevant family intervention for people with schizophrenia and their families in Indonesia. Our theory driven approach utilises an existing heuristic model to explore stakeholder (service-users, caregivers and healthcare professionals; n = 51) preferences and priorities about family interventions and qualitative interviews with key informants (n = 14) exploring implementation related facilitators and barriers that affect the utility and ecological validity of these interventions. We used a modified nominal group technique to allow divergent ideas to be expressed and collated identifying areas of consensus regarding the optimal content, format and delivery of family interventions. Our theory of change outlines that while family interventions primarily target relapse, they may also influence broader outcomes like quality of life, functioning, and social inclusion, though not solely responsible for changes in these areas. Therapist confidence depends on training, supervision, and understanding family needs. Intervention components, based on mechanisms of change and stakeholder preferences, align with empirical and theoretical evidence including psychoeducation, communication skills, and relapse prevention. Addressing maladaptive beliefs about schizophrenia, such as hopelessness and blame, was theorised to foster recovery and reduce stigma, a key stakeholder concern. This theory of change will aid the design of our evaluation, and guide local implementation strategies, inform the development of data collection protocols, and provide a framework for interpreting results. This provides an opportunity to engage stakeholders actively incorporating their perspectives and knowledge into the planning process of the intervention and its implementation, ensuring engagement with policy makers to secure knowledge mobilisation, buy-in and partnership working.

Indexed as

complex interventiondeveloping countriesprogramme theorypsychosispsychosocial interventionSchizophreniatheory of change

Identifiers

PMID41541809
PMCPMC12801161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.