ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Adherence to peripheral venous catheters' guidelines by emergency nurses: A systematic review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macroscopic characteristics and handling aspects of peripheral and central venous catheters in patients treated in a German tertiary care hospital.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peripheral intravenous catheters are widely used in emergency departments for intravenous treatment. However, peripheral intravenous catheter practices supported by the latest evidence remain suboptimal, negatively affecting patient outcomes. Objective: To identify the determinants influencing adherence to peripheral intravenous catheter guidelines in the emergency department (the insertion technique, maintenance protocols, and timely removal) and to analyse strategies for improving adherence. Methods: A systematic review was conducted from August to September 2025, in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete databases (via EBSCOhost), and SCOPUS and included eligible papers published from 2018, according to eligibility criteria: studies involving emergency department nurses or clinicians, focusing on peripheral intravenous catheter adherence determinants and related strategies. This approach followed the methodological guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Statement reporting guidelines for Systematic Reviews. Results: The six studies included in this review identified individual, organisational, and clinical decision-making determinants that influence emergency nurses' adherence to peripheral intravenous catheter infection prevention guidelines, including limited knowledge, training gaps, lack of institutional support, and inconsistent practices. Effective strategies included ongoing education, ultrasound-guided training, the involvement of vascular access teams, and quality improvement approaches like the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. Conclusions: This review identified key determinants and strategies that influence and enhance emergency nurses' adherence to infection prevention guidelines for peripheral intravenous catheter care. The importance of integrating technical training with supportive environments and effective clinical leadership is emphasised throughout multimodal intervention programs. Future interventions should prioritise team empowerment, alignment with institutional goals, and promoting nurses' motivation and self-efficacy, ideally through participatory approaches. Registration: PROSPERO Registration ID CRD42024506801, registered 03/09/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.