ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2026
Exploring the Feasibility of Zero-Shot Super-Resolution in Preclinical Imaging.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical imaging studies are vital to the research, development, and evaluation of new medical therapies. Images acquired during these studies often have high in-plane resolution but low through-plane resolution, resulting in highly anisotropic volumes that hamper downstream volumetric analysis. Additionally, since there are no image acquisition standards across studies, training data for conventional supervised super-resolution (SR) methods is limited. In this work, we compare two SR methods that do not require additional training data. The first is ECLARE, a self-SR approach that creates its own training data from in-plane patches drawn from the anisotropic volume. The second is Biplanar Denoising diffusion null space model (DDNM) Averaging (BiDA), a proposed method leveraging two independently pre-trained denoising diffusion probabilistic models and the DDNM posterior sampling technique. We evaluate both methods first on rat data at two scale factors (2.5× and .5×) and compare signal recovery and downstream task performance. We further evaluate these methods on a different species (mice) to measure their generalizability. Both methods experimentally resulted in good signal recovery performance, but only the images super-resolved by BiDA were accurately skullstripped downstream. Although both methods performed well on the in-domain rat data, BiDA did not fully generalize to the out-of-domain mouse data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.