Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541758›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

NAD

Hao Wu, Junfeng Luo, Zonghui Jian, Min Yang, Jingying Zhao, Jing Fu, Shixiong Yan, Tengfei Dou, Junjing Jia, Lixian Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hao WuFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Junfeng LuoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Zonghui JianFaculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Yunnan Vocational and Technical College of Agriculture, Kunming, China.
Min YangFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Jingying ZhaoFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Jing FuYunnan Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Kunming, China.
Shixiong YanFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Tengfei DouFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Junjing JiaFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Lixian LiuInstitute of Science and Technology, Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong, China.
Zhiqiang XuFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the meat composition, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD Results: Chemical composition showed higher moisture and fat contents in A1 broilers, whereas M1 chickens had greater protein contents ( Conclusion: These results indicate that M1 chickens exhibit enhanced metabolic regulation and protein-rich muscle with distinct lipid remodeling, whereas A1 broilers favor rapid growth and fat accumulation. The study provides mechanistic insight into breed-specific differences in muscle metabolism and meat quality, highlighting NAD

Indexed as

Arbor Acre broilerbreast musclechemical compositionDaweishan miniature chickenkey enzymelipid metabolismNAD+

Identifiers

PMID41541758
PMCPMC12801516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.