Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541714›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Differential subclinical hemolysis after pulsed field ablation using the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter vs the PulseSelect circular multi-electrode array catheter.

Sayana Kuraoka, Masatsugu Nozoe, Hiroshi Mannoji, Ryo Miyake, Tomoki Uchikawa, Akihito Ishikita, Daisuke Nagatomo, Nobuhiro Suematsu, Toru Kubota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sayana KuraokaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masatsugu NozoeDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroshi MannojiDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryo MiyakeDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoki UchikawaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akihito IshikitaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Daisuke NagatomoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuhiro SuematsuDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toru KubotaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Aortic Center, Saiseikai Fukuoka General Hospital, Tenjin, Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal ablation method characterized by favorable tissue selectivity and a low complication rate. However, hemolysis has recently emerged as a PFA-specific concern, particularly associated with the FARAPULSE system. Objective: To assess the incidence and clinical relevance of hemolysis following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the PulseSelect system, in comparison with FARAPULSE and conventional radiofrequency (RF) ablation. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between October 2024 and February 2025 (RF: n = 15; FARAPULSE: n = 39; PulseSelect: n = 66). Hemolysis markers-free plasma hemoglobin, haptoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, and creatinine-were measured before and after ablation. Results: PFA was associated with significantly higher the post-/pre-ablation ratio of free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, whereas the ratio of haptoglobin were significantly lower than with RF. The PulseSelect system resulted in less hemolysis than the FARAPULSE system, as evidenced by smaller increases in free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, and by higher haptoglobin. Notably, although free plasma hemoglobin increased after ablation with both the PulseSelect and FARAPULSE systems, in contrast to FARAPULSE, no correlation was observed between the number of PulseSelect applications and free plasma hemoglobin. No cases of acute kidney injury occurred in any group. Conclusion: The PulseSelect system induced only mild, subclinical hemolysis-comparable to that seen with FARAPULSE-without any clinically significant anemia or acute kidney injury, even in the absence of a limit on the number of applications. These findings support the safe and flexible use of PulseSelect, not only for pulmonary vein isolation, but also for additional lesion sets in more complex ablation procedures.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryAtrial fibrillationFree plasma hemoglobinHemolysisPulsed-field ablation

Identifiers

PMID41541714
PMCPMC12800815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.