ReviewiScience2026
A roadmap for nature-based solutions to extreme wildfires.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme wildfires are escalating in frequency and intensity as climate change, land abandonment, and decades of fire suppression create landscapes primed to burn. Yet wildfire management remains largely absent from the global nature-based solutions (NbSs) agenda. This perspective outlines a roadmap for deploying NbS to reduce wildfire risk and enhance landscape resilience. Key strategies include integrated fire management, close-to-nature forest practices, targeted biomass extraction for bioenergy, and strategically designed green firebreaks. However, several barriers hinder their implementation: public misconceptions of fire, the erosion of traditional fire knowledge, policy fragmentation, limited long-term funding, and insufficient incentives for rural stewardship. Mainstreaming a "fire-smart" approach into NbS requires inclusive governance, local leadership, cross-sector collaboration, and better alignment of environmental, energy, and wildfire policies. Enhanced monitoring, capacity building, and innovative financing are also essential. By addressing these challenges, NbS can become a transformative tool to promote wildfire resilience and long-term sustainability in fire-prone regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.