ArticleiScience2026
Interpretable machine learning for accessible dysphagia screening and staging in older adults.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysphagia in older adults causes serious complications, and efficient and scalable screenings are needed. This prospective multicenter study developed interpretable machine learning (ML) models for the early identification and staging of dysphagia. Nine ML models were built using the clinical data from 1,235 patients and externally validated on 720 patients. All patients were older adults from seven Suzhou hospitals whose dysphagia was confirmed via videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. Features were selected via random forest, and model interpretability was analyzed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The CatBoost model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.914 for binary classification, while neural network gave AUC 0.884 for multiclass classification. External validation confirmed robustness (binary AUC, 0.909 and multiclass macro-AUC, 0.860). SHAP identified ten core features-oral/pharyngeal function influenced all stages, and masticatory/phonatory features acted selectively. A web application was created accordingly to facilitate real-time screening and stratify dysphagia patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.