Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541646›Full record

ReviewACS energy letters2026

Navigating the Catholyte Landscape in All-Solid-State Batteries.

Julian F Baumgärtner, Jaka Šivavec, Matthias Klimpel, Kostiantyn V Kravchyk, Maksym V Kovalenko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in ACS energy letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian F BaumgärtnerLaboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Jaka ŠivavecLaboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Matthias KlimpelLaboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Kostiantyn V KravchykLaboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-193X
Maksym V KovalenkoLaboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-8938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All-solid-state batteries are widely regarded as the next frontier in electrochemical energy storage, offering the potential to surpass the energy density and safety limits of conventional lithium-ion batteries. Among the factors governing their performance, paramount are the choice and functionality of the solid-state electrolyte (SSE) as a catholyte within the composite positive electrode. This perspective critically examines the applicability and potential of the three most intensively studied inorganic SSE families, namely oxides, sulfides, and chlorides, as catholytes. We discuss their respective advantages, limitations, and compatibility with common cathode active materials, as well as the remaining knowledge gaps. We then assess whether any of the current SSE classes can be employed as a stand-alone SSE for all-solid-state batteries, or whether composite architectures combining multiple SSEs will ultimately be required.

Identifiers

PMID41541646
PMCPMC12803501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.