Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541636›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2026

Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Microbial Electromethanogenesis: A Comprehensive Assessment with SHapley Additive exPlanation-Based Insights.

Siddharth Gadkari, Raphael Souza de Oliveira, Silvia Bolognesi, Sebastià Puig, Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siddharth GadkariSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-8534
Raphael Souza de OliveiraStricto Sensu Department, SENAI CIMATEC University, Salvador, Bahia 41650-010, Brazil.
Silvia BolognesiLEQUiA. Institute of the Environment, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi. C/Maria Aurelià Capmany, 69, Girona E-17003, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-0488
Sebastià PuigLEQUiA. Institute of the Environment, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi. C/Maria Aurelià Capmany, 69, Girona E-17003, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2995-1443
Erick Giovani Sperandio NascimentoInstitute for Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-0290

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial electromethanogenesis (EM) presents a promising pathway for sustainable biogas upgrading, but accurately predicting its performance is challenging due to complex, nonlinear process dynamics. Here, we systematically compared seven supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, including one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), adaptive boosting regressor (AdaBoost), stacking regressors, and K-nearest neighbors (kNN), for their predictive biomethane production capabilities using experimental data from EM bioelectrochemical systems (EM-BESs). The data set encompassed operational parameters such as optical density (OD

Indexed as

biogas upgradingconvolutional neural networkmachine learningmicrobial electromethanogenesisSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID41541636
PMCPMC12801386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.