ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Social determinants of low fertility in Asia: a comparative review of trends in East, Southeast and South Asia.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Japanese Patient Enrollment in Multi-regional Clinical Trials for New Drug Applications in Japan: Current Status and Related Factors.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Global Burden and Future Projections of Alopecia Areata: A Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Regional Burden of Spinal Pain in Asia-Pacific Countries and Territories, 1990-2023: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Household wealth and timing of first birth among highly educated women in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from survey-adjusted survival analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asia, home to nearly 60% of the world's population, is central to global demographic change. Fertility trajectories shape population growth, aging, and decline, with implications for labor supply, economic development, family structures, and caregiving. Studying these patterns offers critical insights into the future of population size, structure, and human potential both regionally and globally. This paper addresses gaps in the largely snapshot, country-specific literature by providing a six-decade comparative overview of fertility trends in East, Southeast, and South Asia, with emphasis on their social determinants. Fertility is shaped not only by individual choice or biology but also by broader socioeconomic, cultural, and policy contexts that influence proximate factors of fertility such as union patterns, contraception, postpartum infecundability, and abortion. We identify distinct regional trajectories of fertility decline, examine their underlying drivers, assess the applicability of prevailing theories, and propose an Asymmetric Adaptation Framework to explain Asia's fertility transitions. While socioeconomic development and ideational change have shaped fertility behavior, cultural factors-such as religion, colonial legacies, kinship systems, and family policy-are pivotal in Asia. Certain trends cannot be explained by socioeconomic development alone, reflecting deeper historical and cultural roots. The Asian experience highlights the limits of prevailing Eurocentric, unidirectional theories and underscores the need for regionally grounded explanations that account for the interplay of structural forces, cultural norms, historical contexts, and policy in shaping fertility decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.