ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Contour-informed inter-patient deformable registration for more reliable voxel-based analysis of Head-and-Neck cancer patients.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Segmentation regularized training for multi-domain deep learning registration applied to magnetic resonance-guided prostate cancer radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The registration of individual dose distributions to a reference anatomy represents a key step in voxel-based analysis (VBA), a tool for spatially informed dose-response assessment. Accurate deformable image registration (DIR) is essential for addressing anatomical variability across patients. To improve both global and region-specific alignment, we enhanced our in-house DIR algorithm (CPT-DIR) by incorporating contour-informed regularization. Materials and methods: We evaluated contour-informed CPT-DIR using CT images from 37 Head-and-Neck patients, with seven cases providing ground-truth dose distribution for dose warping validation. Organs at risk (OARs) were delineated manually, with bone contours auto-generated using TotalSegmentator. Contour-informed constraints (Dice Similarity) were integrated to enhance registration in clinically relevant regions. The global registration results were evaluated using MAE, SSIM and PSNR. Geometric accuracy and warped dose accuracy were assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Dose-Organ Overlap (DOO). The performance of CPT-DIR, with and without constraints, was benchmarked against conventional B-spline. Results: CPT-DIR achieved superior accuracy with a MAE of 98.9 ± 6.3 HU, lower than 179.1 ± 17.8 HU for B-spline. Incorporating brainstem contours as regularization improved the DSC from 0.604 ± 0.116 to 0.878 ± 0.017 and DOO from 0.430 ± 0.117 to 0.753 ± 0.043 for brainstem. For the remaining OARs, the enhanced CPT-DIR consistently achieved higher DSC and DOO metrics. Conclusions: The integration of contour-informed regularization in CPT-DIR improved DIR accuracy, particularly in anatomically and dosimetrically relevant regions. This enhanced spatial alignment demonstrated strong potential for advancing reliable inter-patient dosimetric studies in HN radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.