ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
A Machine Learning Strategy to Predict the Number of High-Acuity Children Who Leave Without Being Seen From the Emergency Department.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to create an operationally useful machine learning model that predicts the number of high-acuity left without being seen (LWBS) patients from the pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: We analyzed data from 512,616 ED visits between 2018 and 2024. We developed 6 models (univariate logistic regression using ED census, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularization, support vector machines, random forest, gradient boosting (XGBoost), and temporal fusion transformers) and a majority-vote ensemble to predict the number of high-acuity LWBS pediatric ED patients over an 8-hour period. We used 10 iterations of time series data for model development. Each iteration was trained on progressively increasing amounts of data from 2018 to 2023, using the subsequent 1-year period after training as the test set. The final iteration used all data from 2018 to 2023 for training and the entirety of 2024 for testing. Models were developed for both rolling 8-hour windows and the 12:00 PM to 8:00 PM timeframe, which was an operationalizable example based on our own institution's staffing schedule. Results: At the prespecified threshold of 2 or more high-acuity LWBS patients over 8-hour windows, the XGBoost and temporal fusion transformer models demonstrated the highest predictive performance with an area under the receiving operator curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.86) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.87), respectively. These models also had the highest predictive performance for the daily 12:00 PM to 8:00 PM timeframe. A majority-vote, 3-model ensemble did not result in improved performance. Conclusion: Machine learning models show excellent predictive performance in identifying optimal periods to operationally target and potentially mitigate the high-acuity LWBS phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.