Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541540›Full record

ReviewArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

Reported Rates of Labral Repair and Reconstruction in Primary Hip Arthroscopy Vary Widely Across Published Studies: A Systematic Review.

Paul D Gaschen, Jaydeep Dhillon, Andrew F Ibrahim, Carson Keeter, Matthew J Kraeutler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul D GaschenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.
Jaydeep DhillonDepartment of Orthopedics, Samaritan Health Services, Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.
Andrew F IbrahimTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.
Carson KeeterDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.
Matthew J KraeutlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the reported proportions of labral repair and reconstruction performed during primary hip arthroscopy. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies, published from 2015 to October 2024, on primary hip arthroscopy reporting a number of hips undergoing labral repair versus reconstruction. When labral debridement was performed, these numbers were included as well. The search phrase used was: Results: Seven studies (all Level III) met the inclusion criteria with a total of 4,134 hips undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. Mean patient age ranged from 28.4 to 43.7 years, and the overall percentage of male patients ranged from 11.8% to 52.8% across studies. Procedures were carried out by a total of 13 surgeons. The proportion of cases in which labral repair was performed ranged from 25.7% to 86.9% across studies. Overall, 3,184 labral repairs, 902 labral reconstructions, and 48 selective labral debridements were performed. These procedures represented 25.6% to 86.9%, 13.1% to 21.8%, and 0.0% to 5.5% of procedures, respectively. Conclusions: Among studies reporting labral repair and reconstruction during primary hip arthroscopy, the proportion of each procedure performed varies widely. These findings highlight the procedural heterogeneity across surgeons performing hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of level III studies.

Identifiers

PMID41541540
PMCPMC12800845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.