ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Inferior Clinical Outcomes and Increased Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Patients With Inflammatory Joint Disease: A Minimum 5-Year Matched Cohort Study.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) compared to a matched control group without IJD. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all hip arthroscopies performed between February 2008 and December 2018 at a single center. Patients diagnosed with IJD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with labral tears were included. Exclusion criteria were prior ipsilateral hip conditions (except IJD), hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle <18°), and Tönnis grade >1. Patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up were matched 1:3 to controls based on age, sex, body mass index, and Tönnis grade. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), rates of achieving clinically relevant thresholds, and secondary procedures were compared between groups. Results: A total of 27 hips (23 patients) with IJD were matched to 81 hips (79 patients) in the control group. At a minimum 5-year follow-up, both groups showed significant improvement in all PROs. However, the IJD group had lower postoperative PRO scores and fewer patients meeting patient acceptable symptom state for modified Harris Hip Score and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (29.6% vs 61.7% and 40.7% vs 64.2%). The IJD group had significantly higher odds of requiring a second hip surgery (odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-12.23; Conclusions: Patients with IJD undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS experience significant improvement in PROs at midterm follow-up. However, they achieve clinically significant thresholds less frequently, exhibit increased revision arthroscopy rates, and have higher rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty compared to the control group. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative case series.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.