ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
All-Suture, All-Inside Meniscus Repair Is Safe and Provides Favorable Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current concepts in meniscal suturing techniques: indications, advantages, and limitations.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs), complications, and reoperations after all-inside meniscus repair using an all-suture implant. Methods: A review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients who underwent all-inside meniscus repair using a knotless, tensionable, all-suture implant by the senior author between November 2019 and December 2023. PROs (including Knee Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, pain visual analog scale, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores, as well as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] subscales), and charts were analyzed to monitor change over time. Mixed linear regression, analysis of variance, and estimated marginal means were used to determine factors associated with improved or worsening outcomes. Results: Sixty-three patients were deemed eligible for inclusion. The minimum length of follow-up was 7.33 months (mean, 16.32 months; range, 7.33-43.82 months). All assessed PROs at 6 months postoperatively and final follow-up were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values ( Conclusions: Patients undergoing meniscus repair with knotless, tensionable, all-suture implants showed significantly improved PROs at 6 months after surgery that were maintained through final follow-up, with a 6.35% failure rate. There were zero cases of hardware-related complications, suggesting that knotless, tensionable, all-suture implants are safe and reliable for all-inside meniscus tear repair. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.