ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Incidental Osteopoikilosis in an Ankle Fracture Patient: Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteopoikilosis (OPK) is a benign osteosclerotic dysplasia that is almost always asymptomatic. Its radiographic pattern can mimic osteoblastic metastases. Its coexistence with fractures is rare, and there is no demonstrated increased risk of fracture or issues with bone healing. Our objective was to present a case of an ankle fracture with an incidental finding of OPK and highlight its clinical implications. Clinical Report: A 21-year-old male presented with pain and swelling after twisting his left ankle. X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a comminuted medial malleolus fracture and avulsion of the lateral process of the talus, in addition to multiple well-defined sclerotic foci in the distal tibia, fibula, and talus, consistent with OPK. Laboratory tests were normal, except for vitamin D at 17 ng/mL. No associated endocrinological or rheumatological findings were noted. Open reduction and internal fixation of the medial malleolus was performed using 2.5 mm headless cannulated screws. The outcome was favorable with no pain, full bone healing, 0° dorsiflexion, and 60° plantar flexion at 17-month follow-up. Discussion: OPK shows symmetric epimetaphyseal images, with no periosteal reaction or soft tissue involvement; recognizing this pattern prevents unnecessary invasive studies and anxiety due to differential diagnosis with metastases. In fractures, management should follow standard orthopedic principles, as OPK does not affect biomechanics or healing. Conclusion: OPK is a "do not touch" lesion; diagnosis is based on radiographs or CT scans, differentiating it from malignant processes. In concurrent fractures, standard treatment yields successful results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.