Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541295›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026

Clinical applications of the da Vinci Single-Port robotic system for treatment of colorectal cancer: a narrative review.

Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gyu-Seog ChoiColorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5476-4610
Hye Jin KimColorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-5985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic system (Intuitive Surgical) was developed to enable true single-incision surgery while preserving the dexterity and precision of advanced robotic platforms. Since its clinical introduction, the SP system has generated growing interest in colorectal surgery, particularly for procedures performed in anatomically confined spaces. However, clinical evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. This narrative review summarizes the current clinical applications, technical considerations, and perioperative outcomes of the da Vinci SP system in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Available literature-predominantly from South Korea and selected centers in the United States-suggests that SP surgery is technically feasible for both colon and rectal cancer. In colon cancer, outcomes appear comparable to conventional laparoscopic and multiport robotic approaches, albeit with longer operative times during early experience. In rectal cancer, SP surgery demonstrates distinct technical advantages, including single docking, reduced incision burden, and favorable short-term outcomes, particularly for low anterior resection and intersphincteric resection. Pathologic outcomes, including lymph node yield and resection margins, are oncologically acceptable across reported series. While early results support the safety and feasibility of SP colorectal surgery, long-term oncologic outcomes and high-level comparative evidence remain lacking. Further prospective studies are warranted to define optimal indications and establish the long-term value of this emerging platform.

Indexed as

Colorectal neoplasmsda Vinci SP systemMinimally invasive surgical proceduresRobotic surgical proceduresSingle-port robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41541295
PMCPMC12799355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.