Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541250›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2024

Supporting the drive for net zero by decarbonising general practice - A longitudinal study protocol.

Ana Raquel Nunes, Helen Atherton, Frederik Dahlmann, Abi Eccles, Olivia Geddes, Michael Gregg, Sue Jowett, Florence Karaba, Laura Nelson, Rachel Spencer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Mobilising Knowledge for General Practice Decarbonisation: Maximising Impact Through a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana Raquel NunesUniversity of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-3760
Helen AthertonUniversity of Southampton School of Health Sciences, Southampton, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925
Frederik DahlmannWarwick Business School, Coventry, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-2834
Abi EcclesUniversity of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, England, UK.
Olivia GeddesUniversity of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, England, UK.
Michael GreggPPI Representative, NA, UK.
Sue JowettUniversity of Birmingham Health Economics Unit, Birmingham, England, UK.
Florence KarabaUniversity of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, England, UK.
Laura NelsonNHS Coventry and Warwickshire STP, Rugby, England, UK.
Rachel SpencerUniversity of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, England, UK.
Helen TwohigKeele University School of Medicine, Keele, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8781-1268
Jeremy DaleUniversity of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The urgency to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions in healthcare, highlighted in the United Kingdom (UK) by the 'Delivering a 'Net Zero' National Health Service (NHS)' report, emphasises the need for healthcare organisations to adopt and integrate sustainability practices. General practice is recognised as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but evidence on achieving effective decarbonisation in general practice is limited, a knowledge gap that urgently needs further research. This study protocol sets out a subsequent study designed to examine the current approaches general practice uses for decarbonisation and to provide practical recommendations for facilitating, advancing, and sustaining these efforts, contributing to the goal of a net zero NHS. Methods and analysis: A 30-month longitudinal case study will span three geographical sites in England and use a mixed methods study design. It will adopt a comprehensive approach, merging sociological (Normalisation Process Theory - NPT) and behavioural theories (Theoretical Domains Framework - TDF) to understand and address factors influencing decarbonisation efforts in general practice. NPT focuses on collective behaviours, emphasising relationships and interactions among professionals, patients, and stakeholders. TDF, with 14 domains simplifying behavioural change theories, concentrates on individual, social, and environmental factors. A systematic review will be conducted, and quantitative and qualitative data will be collected over a 12-month period from general practice, staff, patients, public, and key stakeholders' perspectives through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Additionally, a non-clinical carbon calculator, alongside prescribing data, will be gathered to assess measurable changes in carbon emissions, informing a budget impact model for practice-specific and generic use. Dissemination: A dynamic dissemination and impact strategy will be emplyed aimed at ensuring broad awareness, adoption, and accelerated uptake of decarbonisation measures. Outputs, including lay summaries, factsheets, policy briefs and academic presentations will be produced throughout the study and undergo regular review, targeting key audiences and ensuring alignment with regional and national goals.

Indexed as

climate change; carbon footprint; primary care; general practice; longitudinal study; mixed methods.

Identifiers

PMID41541250
PMCPMC12800612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.