ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026
Liver transplantation for hepatopulmonary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prolonged VV-ECMO as a Bridge to Recovery From Persistent Hepatopulmonary Syndrome After Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background & Aims: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a severe pulmonary vascular complication of liver disease. Liver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive treatment, yet a contemporary synthesis of LT outcomes in HPS, alongside persisting uncertainties, is lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies to evaluate HPS prevalence, post-LT survival, and HPS resolution. Results: Pooled HPS prevalence was 17.2% (11.6-24.7%, n = 1,171 studied patients) among patients with cirrhosis evaluated for LT, 26.1% (18.5-35.5%, n = 629) in patients with portal hypertension evaluated for LT and 21.6% (11.2-37.4%, n = 737) in LT recipients. Under current model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception policies, waitlist mortality was 13.1% (0.6-78.5%, n = 1,240 studied patients). Post-LT survival in patients with HPS was comparable to that in patients without HPS and aligned with international benchmarks. Pooled 1-year post-LT survival rates were 85.5% in prospective studies from the pre- and post-MELD era (n = 240 studied patients), 93.9% in the post-MELD era (n = 99), and 83.8% in registry-based studies (n = 800). Pooled estimates for 5-year post-LT survival rates were 85% (n = 144 studied patients), 92.9% (n = 99), and 76% (n = 739), respectively. Lower pre-LT PaO Conclusions: LT offers substantial survival and clinical benefits for patients with HPS, with high rates of HPS resolution within a year. Patients with very severe HPS warrant closer monitoring, and further research is needed to address unresolved questions regarding disease trajectory and post-transplant outcomes. Impact and implications: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment for hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), resulting in high rates of syndrome resolution and post-transplant survival comparable to patients without HPS. These findings support the continued use of MELD exception policies and underscore the importance of timely referral for LT. While outcomes are generally favorable, patients with very severe HPS may experience worse post-transplant outcomes, highlighting the need for more tailored clinical management. A key unmet need remains in understanding the role of underlying liver disease severity in the natural history of HPS, as well as the optimal timing for LT and factors influencing post-transplant recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.