Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541223›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026

Geographical access to community pharmacies in British Columbia, Canada.

Alexander C T Tam, L Olivia Tseng, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander C T TamCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3359-5552
L Olivia TsengCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-4338
Wei ZhangCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7988-1979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The extent of the urban-rural disparity in community pharmacy access in British Columbia (BC), Canada is unknown. We sought to describe this geographical disparity by conducting a geographic information system analysis. Methods: We used publicly available geospatial data on community pharmacy locations, road networks, and community boundaries. A complete list of pharmacies in BC and their addresses were downloaded in December 2024. For each pharmacy, we defined a 5-kilometre service area using the surrounding roads. For each geographic community, we counted the number of pharmacy service areas that intersected the community (i.e. the number of pharmacies that could be accessed by that community). Community-level characteristics such as resident population and urban status were summarised. Discussion: A total of 1,528 community pharmacies and 231 geographic communities were included in the analysis. All 115 medium/large urban communities were in accessible range of five or more pharmacies. The proportion of communities with this level of access (five or more pharmacies) decreased with increasing rurality: 17/22 small urban, 24/77 rural, and 0/17 remote communities. There were 14 remote communities (representing 75.9% of the remote population in BC) with access to either one or zero community pharmacies. Conclusion: Using geographic information system analysis, we have shown the urban-rural disparity in community pharmacy access is evident.

Indexed as

accessibilityCommunity pharmacypublic healthrural practice

Identifiers

PMID41541223
PMCPMC12802516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.