ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Best evidence summary on gastrointestinal function recovery after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Summary of the best evidence for whole-course nutritional management of bladder cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the best available evidence on gastrointestinal function recovery in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted following the Evidence-Based Health care Pyramid 5.0, covering major academic databases, professional society websites, and clinical decision support tools. Literature published up to March 31, 2025, was included. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of included studies and extracted relevant evidence. Results: Nine articles were included, comprising four clinical guidelines and five expert consensuses. The overall methodological quality was high. A total of 18 evidence items were identified, spanning the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care. Conclusions: This review identified 18 evidence-based recommendations for gastrointestinal recovery after radical cystectomy by integrating Enhanced Recovery After Surgery concepts with traditional Chinese medicine techniques. These findings offer practical references for nursing care, while future studies are needed to support evidence implementation and improve outcomes. Systematic review registration: This study was registered in the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20257819).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.