Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541156›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025

Successful rescue of the amputated glans penis placed as a composite graft and the application of continuous papaverine: A case report.

Serdar Nazif Nasır

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Serdar Nazif NasırDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Penile amputation is an uncommon condition reported globally as isolated cases or in small series. The leading cause of penile amputation is psychiatric disorders and self-amputation of external genitalia with hallucinations and delusions stemming from substance abuse. The chance of applying microsurgery is higher since self-mutilation in these cases occurs more frequently near the proximal part of the penis. In contrast, penile amputations caused by circumcision typically occur at the glans level, where microsurgical repair is usually not feasible. Therefore, utilizing a composite graft remains the only option. Case presentation: We present a papaverine application protocol designed to enhance the neovascularization of the composite glans penis graft and maintain graft viability at the highest possible level. Clinical discussion: Distal penile amputations remain surgically challenging. Composite grafting is reported for glans amputations; however, success rates are limited, and necrosis is a common complication. In our case, the use of topical papaverine may have supported neovascularization and graft survival. Additionally, penile amputation cases due to circumcision in the English and non-English literature are reviewed. Conclusion: Composite grafting is the only feasible option for distal penile amputations. Topical papaverine can increase neovascularization, thereby minimizing graft loss, especially in thick tissues such as composite grafts, although larger clinical studies are needed to validate its efficacy.

Indexed as

Case reportCircumcision complicationsComposite graftGlans penis amputationPapaverinePenis reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41541156
PMCPMC12614443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.