ReviewFrontiers in stroke2023
Intracranial pressure elevation post-stroke: Mechanisms and consequences.
Review in Frontiers in stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Multiple Inflammation-Derived Indices and the Risk of Post-Stroke Epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Regulation of the NET Formation-Blood-Brain Barrier Axis in Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Targets and Translational Perspectives.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Predicting intracranial hypertension as a secondary insult using the pathological peptidome of brain injured patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artery of Percheron infarct with multiple cranial nerve palsies and Horner Syndrome.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Brain fluid physiology in ischaemic stroke; more than just oedema.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Review
- Blood-brain barrier breakdown in brain ischemia: Insights from MRI perfusion imaging.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Intracranial pressure is elevated at 24 h post-stroke in mice.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation post-stroke has long been thought of as a cause of secondary deterioration after large, malignant infarction, and dramatic ICP elevation is frequently a pre-terminal event. However, there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that ICP also rises after small stroke, typically within 24 h of the infarct. The timing of this rise suggests that it may play an important role in the collateral failure associated with early infarct expansion. Despite its increasingly recognized importance to patient outcome, very little is currently known about the underlying mechanisms of ICP elevation post-stroke. The traditional understanding suggests ICP elevation occurs solely due to cerebral edema, however this does not seem to be the case in mild-moderate infarction. Instead, recent studies suggest a role for changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume. In this article, we will discuss recent mechanistic observations, as well as the consequences of ICP elevation post-stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.