Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2023

Methodological considerations in PISCES 3: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of intracerebral stem cells in subjects with disability following an ischemic stroke.

Daniel T Laskowitz, Keith W Muir, Sean I Savitz, Lawrence R Wechsler, Julie G Pilitsis, Scott Y Rahimi, Richard L Beckman, Vincent Holmes, Peng R Chen, Laura Juel and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03629275 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intracerebral Stem Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03629275 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intracerebral Stem Cells (CTX0E03) in Subjects With Disability Following an Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorReNeuron LimitedRan2018 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Chronic Stroke, Hemiparesis, Arm ParalysisArmsCTX0E03 Drug Product and delivery device, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microneedle-Assisted Cell Delivery and Therapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel T LaskowitzDuke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, United States.
Keith W MuirQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Sean I SavitzInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Lawrence R WechslerDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Julie G PilitsisDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States.
Scott Y RahimiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, United States.
Richard L BeckmanReNeuron Inc, Pencoed, United Kingdom.
Vincent HolmesReNeuron Inc, Pencoed, United Kingdom.
Peng R ChenInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Laura JuelDepartment of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Deborah KoltaiDuke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, United States.
Brad J KollsDuke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: At present, there are no medical interventions proven to improve functional recovery in patients with subacute stroke. We hypothesize that the intraparenchymal administration of CTX0E03, a conditionally immortalized neural stem cell line, linked with a standardized rehabilitation therapy regimen for the upper limb, would improve functional outcomes in patients 6-12 months after an index ischemic stroke. Study design: PISCES III was designed as a multicenter prospective, sham-controlled, outcome-blinded randomized clinical trial. Eligibility required a qualifying ischemic stroke 6-12 months prior to surgical intervention. Patients must be between 35 and 75 years of age and have residual moderate or moderately severe disability (mRS 3 or 4), with the preservation of some residual upper limb movement. All patients received a standardized regimen of home physical therapy following the intervention. Study outcomes: The primary outcome measure is improvement in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of disability at 6 months post treatment. Secondary outcomes include assessment of activities of daily living (Barthel Index), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go; Fugl Meyer Assessment), neurological impairment (NIHSS), upper limb function (Chedoke Arm and Hand Inventory), as well as patient related quality of life and global rating scales. Discussion: PISCES III was designed as a randomized trial directly comparing the effects of intraparenchymal injection of a conditional stem cell line vs. sham procedure in patients with subacute stroke. This is one of the first studies of this type to include a standardized minimum rehabilitation protocol. As there are a limited number of studies evaluating invasive stem cell administration in the chronic setting of CNS injury, study design considerations are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03629275.

Indexed as

cell based interventionischemic stroke (IS)stem cellstroke outcome measuresstroke therapy

Identifiers

PMID41541089
PMCPMC12802619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.