ArticleFrontiers in stroke2023
Methodological considerations in PISCES 3: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of intracerebral stem cells in subjects with disability following an ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03629275 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intracerebral Stem Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intracerebral Stem Cells (CTX0E03) in Subjects With Disability Following an Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soft robotic gloves versus mirror therapy: a long-term comparative study on hand function and motor recovery in post-stroke rehabilitation.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Trial
- Progress in Intra-Arterial Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Review.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Public Awareness and Perceptions of Stem Cell Therapy for Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Stem Cell Therapy: Past, Present, and Future Aspects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Microneedle-Assisted Cell Delivery and Therapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and hypothesis: At present, there are no medical interventions proven to improve functional recovery in patients with subacute stroke. We hypothesize that the intraparenchymal administration of CTX0E03, a conditionally immortalized neural stem cell line, linked with a standardized rehabilitation therapy regimen for the upper limb, would improve functional outcomes in patients 6-12 months after an index ischemic stroke. Study design: PISCES III was designed as a multicenter prospective, sham-controlled, outcome-blinded randomized clinical trial. Eligibility required a qualifying ischemic stroke 6-12 months prior to surgical intervention. Patients must be between 35 and 75 years of age and have residual moderate or moderately severe disability (mRS 3 or 4), with the preservation of some residual upper limb movement. All patients received a standardized regimen of home physical therapy following the intervention. Study outcomes: The primary outcome measure is improvement in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of disability at 6 months post treatment. Secondary outcomes include assessment of activities of daily living (Barthel Index), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go; Fugl Meyer Assessment), neurological impairment (NIHSS), upper limb function (Chedoke Arm and Hand Inventory), as well as patient related quality of life and global rating scales. Discussion: PISCES III was designed as a randomized trial directly comparing the effects of intraparenchymal injection of a conditional stem cell line vs. sham procedure in patients with subacute stroke. This is one of the first studies of this type to include a standardized minimum rehabilitation protocol. As there are a limited number of studies evaluating invasive stem cell administration in the chronic setting of CNS injury, study design considerations are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT03629275.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.