Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541082›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in stroke2023

Hyperacute assessment of vertigo in suspected stroke.

Stacy Morrow, Nehzat Koohi, Diego Kaski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acute vertigo: stroke or not?Current opinion in neurology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stacy MorrowGlobal Product Management, Natus, Taastrup, Denmark.
Nehzat KoohiSENSE Research Unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Diego KaskiSENSE Research Unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of patients with acute vertigo is most challenging in the hyperacute phase, both due to the complexity of vertigo as a symptom, the range of possible causes, and the lack of training in neuro-otology for non-specialists. Perhaps of greatest relevance is differentiating between peripheral (usually benign, e.g., inner ear) causes and central (potentially more sinister, e.g., stroke) causes. Several diagnostic algorithms have been introduced to help detect stroke in patients with acute vertigo. However, these algorithms have been largely validated in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome (with nystagmus) for whom symptoms have been present for a minimum of 24 h. The most challenging period within the diagnostic process is the hyperacute phase that determines triage and treatment, but where none of the established algorithms have been validated. In this review, we specifically describe practical implementation considerations for evaluating patients with hyperacute vertigo, including the timing of diagnostic testing within the emergency department pathway, resource availability, and pitfalls associated with current practices.

Indexed as

assessmentsdizzinesseducationHINTShyperacutestroketelemedicinevertigo

Identifiers

PMID41541082
PMCPMC12802659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.