ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Development and validation of colorectal cancer and colonoscopy screening health beliefs scale for first-degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer (CCHBS-FDR) in China.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the study was to develop and validate the psychometric properties of the Colorectal Cancer and Colonoscopy Screening Health Beliefs Scale for First-Degree Relatives (CCHBS-FDR) instrument for the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with colorectal cancer (CRC) in China. Methods: This study was conducted in two phases: scale development and psychometric testing. In the scale development phase, a preliminary item pool was established based on a systematic review, qualitative interviews ( Results: A preliminary 37-item scale with six dimensions, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, barriers-priority, barriers-concerns and barriers-knowledge, was developed in the first phase. The content validity index of the CCHBS-FDR was satisfactory (I-CVI = 0.86-1, S-CVI/UA = 0.89, S-CVI/Ave = 0.98). Cronbach's Conclusions: The CCHBS-FDR demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity as a culturally specific instrument for assessing health beliefs among FDRs with CRC. It can serve as a valuable tool for providing a more precise assessment of health beliefs and helping healthcare professionals develop and evaluate tailored communication interventions to promote colonoscopy screening among FDRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.