Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541009›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

A scoping review of breakthrough cancer pain: Multidimensional patient needs and influencing factors.

Qingyi Li, Yanlei Sheng, Xinyu Liu, Jie Li, Lisi Zhu, Yang Yang, Luhong Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Breakthrough cancer pain management (BTcP)-gap analysis of the current Australian landscape.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingyi LiNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yanlei ShengNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinyu LiuNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lisi ZhuNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yang YangNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Luhong HuNursing Department, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP), a common complication among cancer patients, has been confirmed to have extensive impacts on patients' lives. However, existing research remains fragmented, lacking a systematic theoretical framework to integrate these findings. This scoping review aimed to systematically examine the multidimensional needs and influencing factors of BTcP patients based on Kolcaba's Comfort Theory, construct a conceptual mapping of BTcP needs and influences, and explore the theoretical foundations and practical pathways of related interventions. Methods: Using a scoping review methodology, we retrieved literature on BTcP impact studies from databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, AMED, and Google Scholar, deadline for searching the database is January 2025. We qualitatively integrated existing research results using the Comfort Theory's four dimensions (physical, psychological, social, environmental) and three stages (needs assessment, intervention implementation, effect evaluation) as an organizational framework. Results: A total of 30 studies were included. The findings revealed that BTcP patients' needs are multidimensional, with interactions between different dimensions forming a complex network of needs. Eleven key characteristic categories of BTcP impacts were extracted. Within the Comfort Theory's four-dimensional framework: Physical comfort dimension primarily addressed functional impacts, sleep influences, and treatment experiences; Psychological comfort dimension encompassed psychological impacts, quality of life (psychological aspects), and psychological treatment barriers; Social comfort dimension focused on work and social activity impacts, economic influences, caregiver burden, and communication challenges; Environmental comfort dimension included system support needs and related treatment barriers, Additionally, two intervention studies were discovered, providing preliminary evidence for BTcP management under the Comfort Theory's three-stage framework. Conclusions: This study is the first to systematically integrate BTcP impact factor research using Comfort Theory, constructing a multidimensional conceptual map of BTcP influences. The findings reveal that BTcP impacts extend far beyond pain itself, involving various aspects of patient life. The Comfort Theory framework facilitates comprehensive assessment and intervention of BTcP in clinical practice. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating interventions addressing comfort needs across different dimensions.

Indexed as

Breakthrough cancer painComfort needsComfort theoryMultidimensional impactScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41541009
PMCPMC12802105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.