ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Machine learning-based prediction of permanent ileostomy in older adults after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Conversion from temporary stoma to a permanent stoma (PS) following loop ileostomy (LI) significantly impairs patients' quality of life and prognosis. However, few predictive tools are currently available in clinical practice. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of PS following laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) in older adults with rectal cancer. Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 956 older adults (age ≥ 60 years) who underwent LAR with LI between June 2015 and December 2024 at two campuses of the First Hospital of China Medical University. After random stratification into training and test sets (7:3 ratio), variables were selected using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression. Seven ML algorithms-logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and neural network (NNet)-were employed to construct predictive models. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the precision-recall area under the curve (PRAUC), confusion matrix metrics, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values, and a nomogram was developed to facilitate clinical utility. Results: The incidence of PS in the cohort was 22.4% (214/956). The LR model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.822 (95% CI: 0.763-0.881) and a PRAUC of 0.587 (95% CI: 0.464-0.705), along with optimal balanced accuracy (0.752), recall (0.719), and F1 score (0.582). SHAP analysis identified age, diabetes, and postoperative adjuvant therapy as the most influential predictors of PS. Conclusions: The LR-based model exhibited robust discriminative ability and clinical applicability for predicting PS in older patients following LAR. This tool facilitates the early identification of high-risk individuals, thereby enabling personalized interventions to mitigate adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.