ArticleAerosol and air quality research2024
Assessment of a membrane filter coated with hygroscopic glycerol for improved recovery of airborne viable bacteriophage MS2.
Article in Aerosol and air quality research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The viability of viruses collected on membrane filters during air sampling is compromised by desiccation. This leads to an underestimation of the concentration of viable viruses in the air. We investigated whether adding a hygroscopic glycerol coating to membrane filters could enhance the recovery of viable bacteriophage MS2 collected through air sampling. Mixed cellulose ester (MCE) filters were coated with glycerol and compared with as-packaged filters (APF) as a control to determine the impact of glycerol on MS2 viability. First, MS2 viability upon direct deposition of MS2 suspension on APF vs. glycerol-coated filters (GCF) was assessed at benchtop. On average 121% more viable MS2 were recovered from GCF than APF (p = 0.031). MS2 was then aerosolized and collected onto APF, GCF, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-wetted filters (PWF), and gelatin filters (GF). All filter types collected statistically similar (p > 0.05) amounts of aerosolized virus at 50% RH according to RT-qPCR analysis. Viable virus recovery from GCF was significantly lower than from APF (p = 0.011) at 50% RH but significantly higher (p = 0.0004) at 80% RH. APF and GCF preconditioned for 30 minutes at 80% RH were also assessed for MS2 aerosol sampling. Results showed higher viable virus recovery from GCF than either APF (p = 0.021) or GF (p = 0.006). High RH in aerosols facilitated viability conservation of MS2 on GCF, leading to improved recovery of viable virus from membrane filters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.