Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540978›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

The contribution of beef consumed as part of the National School Lunch Program to nutrient intake and adequacy: a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018 Analysis.

Kristina S Petersen, Kristin Fulgoni, Victor L Fulgoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristina S PetersenDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Kristin FulgoniNutrition Impact LLC, Battle Creek, MI, United States.
Victor L FulgoniNutrition Impact LLC, Battle Creek, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Beef intake in youth is associated with higher micronutrient intake. The contribution of beef consumed as part of the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) to nutrient intake is unclear, and warrants investigation given the variety of options used to meet the NSLP meats/meat alternates requirements. Objectives: The aim was to examine nutrient intake and adequacy in NSLP participants consuming beef, compared with those not consuming beef, overall, by gender-age categories, and food security status. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2018 were used. NSLP participants were defined by a previously published method. Nutrient intake was assessed from the first 24-h recall. Usual nutrient intake, calculated from both recalls, was used to estimate nutrient adequacy assessed by the percentage of the population below the estimated average requirement (EAR); percentage above the adequate intake (AI) was also estimated. Regression analyses were used to examine differences in nutrient intake between beef consumers compared with nonconsumers at school lunch with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and energy intake. Results: The analytical sample included 3046 (weighted Conclusions: Beef intake as part of the NSLP made a limited contribution to nutrient intake and adequacy; however, beef intake at school lunch was low.

Indexed as

beefmeatNational School Lunch Programnutrient adequacynutrient intakered meat

Identifiers

PMID41540978
PMCPMC12799504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.