ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
The contribution of beef consumed as part of the National School Lunch Program to nutrient intake and adequacy: a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018 Analysis.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Beef intake in youth is associated with higher micronutrient intake. The contribution of beef consumed as part of the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) to nutrient intake is unclear, and warrants investigation given the variety of options used to meet the NSLP meats/meat alternates requirements. Objectives: The aim was to examine nutrient intake and adequacy in NSLP participants consuming beef, compared with those not consuming beef, overall, by gender-age categories, and food security status. Methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2018 were used. NSLP participants were defined by a previously published method. Nutrient intake was assessed from the first 24-h recall. Usual nutrient intake, calculated from both recalls, was used to estimate nutrient adequacy assessed by the percentage of the population below the estimated average requirement (EAR); percentage above the adequate intake (AI) was also estimated. Regression analyses were used to examine differences in nutrient intake between beef consumers compared with nonconsumers at school lunch with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and energy intake. Results: The analytical sample included 3046 (weighted Conclusions: Beef intake as part of the NSLP made a limited contribution to nutrient intake and adequacy; however, beef intake at school lunch was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.