ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Combined Use of EMG and Muscle Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Scapular Winging.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined Use of EMG and Muscle Ultrasound for the Evaluation of Scapular Winging.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsScapular winging occurs as an abnormal protrusion of the scapula due to nerve injury, muscle weakness, bone, or joint pathology. The main muscular stabilizers of the scapula include the serratus anterior, trapezius, rhomboid major and minor, levator scapulae, and pectoralis minor. Needle electromyography (EMG) has historically been used as one of the primary diagnostic tests for evaluating this finding. However, sampling of these muscles can be technically difficult and carries risks for complications. Muscle ultrasound (MUS) can also reliably identify abnormalities in the muscles involved in scapular stabilization while offering the benefit of rapid side-to-side comparison and improved patient comfort. This study aims to highlight the concordance of ultrasound and EMG findings using our published MUS protocol in patients with scapular winging.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 13 patients who presented to an electrodiagnostic (EDX) laboratory with the referral diagnosis of "scapular winging" or "scapular dyskinesis." All patients underwent MUS testing of scapular muscles according to a previously published protocol followed by EMG of muscles deemed relevant by the clinician.
resultsSeven patients were found to have a neurogenic cause of their scapular winging and in those patients, all had both EMG and MUS abnormalities. MUS was found to have a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 95.7%, and individual muscle concordance with EMG of 90.6%. DISCUSSION: There is high concordance between EMG and MUS in patients with scapular winging. This combined with potential advantages of the MUS modality supports their concurrent use in patients with scapular winging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.