Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540898›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Understanding the Nurse Champion Concept and the Training Initiatives for Nurse Champions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Wilmer J Santos, Ian D Graham, Amanda Vandyk, Gillian Harvey, Janet E Squires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wilmer J SantosSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Room 313, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada, 1 613-562-5800, ext 5473.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-2724
Ian D GrahamSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Room 313, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada, 1 613-562-5800, ext 5473.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-1216
Amanda VandykSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Room 313, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada, 1 613-562-5800, ext 5473.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-7136
Gillian HarveyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0937-7819
Janet E SquiresSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Room 313, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada, 1 613-562-5800, ext 5473.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-7189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is current evidence that a proportion of health care services provided to patients do not align with best evidence. A nurse champion, defined as a nurse who either volunteers or is identified by the management to facilitate or promote the implementation of an innovation (eg, new knowledge or practice), is an important factor for implementation success. The existing literature describes health care champions' attributes, roles, and behaviors, the processes in which they might enable change, and their effectiveness at facilitating implementation. However, a more detailed exploration of the nurse champion concept is needed. Further, despite the prolific use of nurse champions in health care implementation, there is a gap in the literature pertaining to what nurse champion training initiatives exist, what competencies are important to be a nurse champion, and whether current training initiatives are effective in preparing nurse champions. Finally, the extent to which equity, diversity, and inclusion are considered in the nurse champion literature is unknown. Objective: This study aims to (1) develop a preliminary conceptual understanding of nurse champions, (2) describe the characteristics of existing champion training initiatives in health care that prepare nurse champions and synthesize the competencies that are covered in these champion training initiatives, (3) synthesize the findings of studies that examined the effectiveness of nurse champion training initiatives in preparing nurses to be effective champions, and (4) evaluate the extent to which equity, diversity, and inclusion are considered in studies that define nurse champions and in studies describing or evaluating nurse champion training initiatives attended by nurse champions. Methods: This series of linked reviews will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We will systematically search 8 electronic databases using a Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. We will also search for gray literature (eg, theses and dissertations). We will upload the records from our database searches into Covidence. Two individuals from the research team will perform title and abstract and full-text screening independently and in duplicate using a piloted inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two individuals will perform data extraction and quality appraisal independently and in duplicate. Conflicts will be resolved with consensus. We will perform various forms of content analysis to address our varying research questions and objectives. Results: As of January 2026, we have completed more than half of our title and abstract screening. We expect to present the results in a scoping review later in 2026. Conclusions: The results of this research will provide recommendations for current and future nurse champion training initiatives. Although this review is limited to the nursing discipline, the results may be transferable to understanding champions in other contexts.

Indexed as

LeadershipNursesNurse's RoleDelivery of Health CareHumansScoping Reviews as Topicdiversityequityfacilitationhealth careimplementationinclusionnurse championsnursing

Identifiers

PMID41540898
PMCPMC12808872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.