ArticleThoracic cancer2026
Evolving Patterns of Care, Outcomes and Ongoing Challenges for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era: A Queensland Population-Based Study.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical efficacy and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus wedge resection in elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Evolving Patterns of Care, Outcomes and Ongoing Challenges for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era: A Queensland Population-Based Study.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis retrospective study describes contemporary patterns of care and outcomes for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Queensland, Australia, with a focus on immunotherapy.
methodsPopulation-based data for patients with NSCLC diagnosed at stages I-III between 2018 and 2022 were sourced from the Queensland Oncology Repository. Follow-up on treatment and mortality was available to 31 December 2024. Poisson models were used to determine patient and clinical characteristics associated with the treatments received. Differences in five-year observed survival were calculated from multivariable flexible parametric models.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 4608 patients. Surgery alone was the most common treatment modality for stages I and II (55% and 27%, respectively), whereas 44% of patients with stage III disease had concurrent chemoradiotherapy without surgery. Just over half (53%) of this latter group were also treated with durvalumab. First Nations people were somewhat less likely to receive either surgery (relative likelihood = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-1.00; p = 0.04) or chemotherapy (RL = 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99; p = 0.03) compared to other Queensland residents. Five-year observed survival ranged from 17% (95% CI 11%-25%) for stage IIIC to 81% (95% CI 74%-87%) for stage IA1. Patients with unresected stage III disease who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with subsequent durvalumab were 37% less likely to die from NSCLC within 5 years of diagnosis than chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.78; p < 0.001).
conclusionsDisparities in treatment for First Nation people with NSCLC require urgent attention. Durvalumab provides a survival advantage for unresectable stage III NSCLC within a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.